Pretectal
Build with me

Worked example / research communication

Give a result room to be understood.

Try a short research presentation, then inspect the teaching decisions behind it. One endpoint, a prediction, and a clear limit on the conclusion.

Try the presentation ↓Download the annotated storyboard ↓
BLINK / Predict

What can a trial tell us?

Before seeing the chart, choose the kind of conclusion this comparison could support.

Choose a prediction, or continue to inspect the evidence.

Scene 1 of 4
Pretectal · Updated October 2, 2026Sources, AI use & review status ↗

The static teaching sequence

This sequence is also usable as a slide or handout outline when the interactive view is unavailable.

  1. PredictAsk what kind of conclusion a group comparison supports. Keep the initial answer until the final scene.
  2. InspectCompare the same endpoint on a shared scale using the values below.
  3. InterpretDistinguish slower growth from reversal and group findings from individual predictions.
  4. ExplainAsk learners to choose the group-level explanation and discuss why the alternatives overclaim.

The source stays attached.

BLINK: adjusted three-year eye growth, Table 2
Lens groupChange (mm)
Single vision0.66
Medium add0.58
High add0.42

These are published aggregate values. No individual observations or time series were generated for the example. The reported contrast and confidence interval appear in the interpretation scene and downloadable storyboard.

Explore both outcomes in the original BLINK exhibit ↗

What this example demonstrates

It demonstrates an authored teaching sequence and an inspectable implementation. It does not establish that the sequence improves learning or is ready for accredited delivery.

Inputs
The published paper, the existing Pretectal evidence explorer, and a goal of teaching the limits of a group comparison.
AI contribution
Draft wording, interaction structure, and interface code.
Checks during production
Source lookup for the displayed values and contrast. Interface and delivery checks are distinct from clinical peer review.
Remaining validation
Independent subject review, presenter rehearsal, and evaluation with intended learners.

Use the process on your next topic.

Start with one question, build the evidence map, and draft the answer explanations before the interface. Keep the source values and review notes with the final presentation.

Follow the full workflowGet the evidence-map template ↓

Sources and further reading

Source links checked October 2, 2026. Our production workflows are editorial recommendations; provider requirements apply to their own activities.

The BLINK randomized clinical trial (opens in a new tab) ↗

Walline et al. · JAMA · 2020

Primary source for the worked example; Table 2 contains the adjusted outcomes and contrasts.